header-logo header-logo

02 September 2026
Issue: 8175 / Categories: Legal News , Artificial intelligence , Legal services
printer mail-detail

JUSTICE research finds AI chatbot chaos

One in six people with a legal dispute in the past two years used an AI chatbot to discuss the issue or draft complaints, research by charity JUSTICE and research group the Administrative Fairness Lab has found

Their report, ‘What AI chatbots can teach us about unmet legal needs’, published this week, highlights concerns the friendly and validating tone of chatbots can make them more prone to make mistakes and reinforce false beliefs.

Those using AI were more likely to be younger, male, employed and to seek further help from Citizens Advice or a legal advice charity. This aligns with anecdotal reports suggesting the legal advice sector is struggling with large amounts of AI-generated documentation brought by clients. JUSTICE asks whether the release of ChatGPT in November 2022 may also be a factor behind the 30% rise in county court claims between 2022 and 2025.

Ellen Lefley, deputy legal director at JUSTICE, said: ‘AI is clearly meeting some unmet legal need, but not helping the most excluded or marginalised.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll