header-logo header-logo

04 February 2011 / Juliet Carp
Issue: 7451 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Justice for fathers?

Juliet Carp welcomes a new addition to the family—transferable maternity leave

Politicians have been talking for a long time about letting families decide how fathers and mothers should split leave after a baby is born. The Additional Paternity Leave Regulations 2010 (SI 2010/1055) are finally due to come into force for families whose babies are due on or after 3 April 2011. This will allow up to 26 weeks’ “additional maternity leave” to be transferred to a baby’s father after the mother has returned to work. (Similar arrangements apply to same sex families and adopting families.)

Upside

The new legislation offers some positive benefits. Clearly, many fathers will have greater opportunity to spend time with their new babies (and older siblings) and, at a more practical level, this could give families where the mother earns more than the father a chance to make some financial savings. Many comment that, given typical disparities in earning power, most fathers will not take up the offer of additional paternity leave. However, that rather misses the point. Large numbers of fathers do not have to take additional paternity

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll