header-logo header-logo

05 May 2020
Issue: 7885 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail

Justice adapts to COVID-19

The Civil Justice Council (CJC) has commissioned an urgent review into the impact of COVID-19 on the civil justice system

The two-week independent review, due to end on 15 May and report back on 22 May, will be led by Dr Natalie Byrom, director of research at the Legal Education Foundation.

It will look at the swift expansion of the use of remote hearings, focusing on the experience of court users, and aims to offer practical recommendations for improvement. Practitioners are invited to submit materials to consultation@theLEF.org or, if they have taken part in or observed a remote hearing since 19 March, complete the CJC survey at www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/CJC_CovidReview. A virtual consultation meeting will be held on 11 May (joining instructions to be issued at a later date).

Sir Terence Etherton, Master of the Rolls, said: ‘The evidence collected by this review will be invaluable in shaping the way forward for the civil justice system, both immediately and in the longer term.’

Meanwhile, the Jury Trial Working Group has made progress on plans to resume jury trials in criminal cases.

The group, chaired by Mr Justice Edis, met this week to discuss plans to restart jury trials in certain Crown Courts with enough space and a suitable design to allow for social distancing. It has identified a small number of Crown Courts as potential venues.

Further assessment will now take place with support from representatives of Public Health England and Public Health Wales, with the results due to be reported back to the group at its meeting next week.

The group is also assessing the readiness of criminal justice agencies and partners to support jury trials at these locations. 

The Lord Chief Justice postponed all new jury trials on 23 March, and the working group was convened a month later to look for ways to restart jury trials safely. 

Issue: 7885 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll