header-logo header-logo

31 July 2008 / Seamus Burns
Issue: 7332 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Justice— not a lottery?

The decision in Hoare represents a common sense approach to achieving justice, says Seamus Burns

Fears of the floodgates being opened following the High Court decision in A v Hoare [2008] EWHC 1573 (QB) (08 July 2008), [2008] All ER (D) 95 (Jul) are greatly exaggerated and misconceived.

However, Mr Justice Coulson's decision to exercise his discretion under s 33 of the Limitation Act 1980 (LA 1980) and to disapply the relevant three-year limitation period, so that the claimant, Mrs A, was entitled to pursue her claim for damages, represents a welcome sign that the courts are prepared to fashion the law in a manner conducive to achieving justice.

Mrs A commenced her proceedings on 22 December 2004, more than 16 years after the defendant, Iorworth Hoare, had been convicted of attempted rape of her and sentenced to life imprisonment (and who had subsequently been released from prison on licence on 10 May 2004, and had fortuitously won £7m on the National Lottery, whilst still on day release).

The High Court decision follows hard on the heals of the House of Lords' decision [2008]

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll