header-logo header-logo

14 September 2012 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7529 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Just rewards

Paola Fudakowska & Henrietta Mason provide a wills & probate update

In the recently decided case of Re JC [2012] WTLR 1211, JC had four children:

  • A, with A’s mother who was 15 when she gave birth. A was subsequently put into a children’s home and then fostered. JC denied being A’s biological father but a paternity test confirmed otherwise.
  • B and C were born following JC’s marriage to Mrs C. They divorced due to JC’s violence and aggression to all members of the family.
  • D was born almost a year after JC and Mrs C divorced (the consequence of JC raping Mrs C). D was given up for adoption as Mrs C was living in considerable poverty.

Neither B nor C had contact with JC for decades, but had been in contact in the later stages of his life. A was in contact with JC throughout his life despite JC denying paternity. D had made contact with her mother and B and C, but had never met JC (he again denied paternity).

In 2008, JC executed a will appointing B and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll