header-logo header-logo

08 February 2007 / Stuart Pemble
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Just hot air?

Do the government’s plans for carbon-neutral homes stack up? asks Stuart Pemble

In his Pre-Budget Report, Investing in Britain’s Potential: Building Our Long-Term Future (Cm 6984), on 6 December 2006, the Chancellor Gordon Brown announced a brave new green world: all new homes are to be carbon neutral by 2010. However, by the time Ruth Kelly, Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, launched the government’s consultation on the process—Building a Greener Future: Towards Zero Carbon Development—a week later, the timetable had already slipped to 2016. Everyone appears to agree on the need for change: in 2004, energy use in UK homes was responsible for a quarter of all of our carbon emissions. But what can be done in practice?

Regulation, regulation…

The most obvious change is that the Building Regulations 2000 (SI 2000/2531) (the regulations), the regime of statutory instruments which underpin the Building Act 1984, need to be changed. Once the government has decided on what constitutes a carbon-neutral home, any home constructed will have to comply with the regulations. Failure to do so can result in a fine not exceeding level

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll