header-logo header-logo

23 March 2007
Issue: 7265 / Categories: Legal News , Company , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Just Fabulous delivers blow to carousel fraud

HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has won a court victory against VAT ‘carousel’ fraud.

HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has won a court victory against VAT ‘carousel’ fraud. Mr Justice Burton in R (Just Fabulous (UK) Ltd) v HM Revenue & Customs held that Just Fabulous could not reclaim £19.5m VAT relating to its purchase of mobile phones from four suppliers.

The case concerns a type of carousel fraud—the repeated importing and exporting of goods from EU countries, with the VAT being reclaimed each time— known as contra or offset trading where carousels across several borders are linked, making it more difficult for the authorities to track them down.

Just Fabulous and two other firms, Evolution Export Trading and Brayfal, claimed they could not have been expected to know a fraud was taking place in a trade chain different from theirs.

HMRC successfully argued that the European Court of Justice case, Axel Kittel v Belgian State: C-439/04, applied to offset trading, meaning it was entitled to deny repayment to firms that knew, or should have known, that some fraud was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll