header-logo header-logo

26 March 2010 / Patrick Allen
Issue: 7410 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

Just the beginning

Much of what has been written on the Jackson report so far suggests that the time for debate is over. This is not correct. The debate is just beginning.

Much of what has been written on the Jackson report so far suggests that the time for debate is over. This is not correct. The debate is just beginning. We can see that costs in personal injury cases are the main target of the report. The Jackson package has the potential to cause grave disadvantage to injured claimants and their ability to bring forward their claims.

We therefore have an obligation to subject the proposals to rigorous scrutiny to see whether they represent an improvement on the current system or a setback to access to justice.

Principles

Civilised society must have an effective system of civil and criminal justice which ensures that all citizens, rich or poor can bring their claims to court. Before 1950, we had no legal aid. Only the wealthy and some trade union members could use the civil courts. If all

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll