header-logo header-logo

Jury trials: in the dock

31 January 2025 / Charles Kuhn
Issue: 8102 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
206026
What will be the verdict on replacing juries with an intermediate tier? Charles Kuhn examines the evidence

Following a substantial increase in Crown Court backlogs, the Ministry of Justice has floated the idea of restricting the use of jury trials and creating an ‘intermediate tier’ of court offences. The aim is to push some less serious cases, such as shoplifting and drug offences, away from a judge or jury trial to an intermediate tier, which is somewhere between a jury trial and a magistrates-only trial.

The intermediate tier would be comprised of a judge, supported by two magistrates. The purpose of this change is to make inroads into the backlogs, which currently stand at around 73,000 Crown Court cases and are predicted to reach 100,000.

Former High Court judge Sir Brian Leveson is to lead a review, aiming for completion in spring 2025. It will also look at expanding magistrates’ sentencing powers from six months to 12 months to bring about more capacity in the magistrates’ courts.

Unsurprisingly, the idea has faced fierce resistance by criminal justice practitioners, who argue

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll