header-logo header-logo

29 September 2023 / Janna Purdie
Issue: 8042 / Categories: Features , Jurisdiction , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Jurisdictional service gateways

Janna Purdie provides a handy guide to cross-border service & jurisdiction clauses
  • Recent cases provide insight into one of the service gateways which enables claimants to serve a claim form overseas without the court’s permission. 

A vital step when commencing proceedings in the English courts is the valid service of the claim form on the defendant—failure provides the defendant with the opportunity to challenge the court’s jurisdiction to determine the claim. When serving overseas, an essential requirement is that the court has jurisdiction over the defendant(s) to determine the dispute before it. The rules setting out whether this is the case are known as the so-called ‘jurisdictional service gateways’ and are set out in:

  • CPR 6.32 and CPR 6.33—these rules enable the claimant to determine whether the court has jurisdiction, or 
  • CPR PD 6B, para 3.1—these rules are applied by the court when determining whether the gateway(s) relied on by the claimant are applicable ie an application for permission to serve out of the jurisdiction is required.

In both cases, the court’s jurisdiction may still be challenged by the defendant. Both sets

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll