header-logo header-logo

Judicial review—Costs of application—Protective costs order

20 January 2011
Issue: 7449 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of Edwards and another) v Environment Agency (Cemex UK Cement Ltd, intervening) [2010] UKSC 57, [2010] All ER (D) 183 (Dec)

Supreme Court, Lord Hope DP, Lord Walker, Lord Brown, Lord Mance and Sir John Dyson SCJJ, 15 Dec 2010

It is not open to costs officers, where applications to reduce or cap a party’s liability have been made to, considered and rejected by the court, to achieve that result through the detailed assessment process.

David Wolfe (instructed by Richard Buxton Environmental and Public Law) for the claimant.  James Eadie QC, James Maurici and Charles Banner (instructed by the treasury solicitor) for the secretary of state.

The underlying action concerned an application for judicial review of the Environmental Agency’s decision to issue a permit for the operation of a cement works. Permission had been granted to use shredded tyres as fuel for the works and there had been a public campaign against that decision. The appellant failed before the Court of Appeal and appealed to the House of Lords. She sought an order varying or dispensing with the requirement to give

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn Premium Content

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

back-to-top-scroll