header-logo header-logo

08 February 2008
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Revalue of claim

If the court serves a claim form by post in disregard for the request of the claimant’s solicitors that...

If the court serves a claim form by post in disregard for the request of the claimant’s solicitors that the form should be sent to them to effect personal service when they are ready, is the court empowered to set the postal service aside?


There is no authority on whether service in this situation is bad. It may be good. The appropriate course—and the one normally adopted when the situation does arise—is for the time to be extended for filing and service of the particulars of claim (if not already served). In a personal injury claim there can be an extension for any medical report to be relied on and the schedule of loss. The duration of the extension may be the period sought by the claimant’s solicitors up to a maximum of four months from issue. If the particulars of claim have been served, the time for service of the defence can be suitably extended instead. The procedural judge is likely to be prepared

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll