header-logo header-logo

09 September 2016
Issue: 7713 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Judgments without particulars of claim

A claimant who has commenced a money claim on line may subsequently serve the particulars of claim but CPR PD 7E.11 requires the filing of a certificate of service of those particulars in form B215 within 14 days of service being effected. Why do the CPR or PD 7E not provide for the particulars of claim to be filed before judgment can be entered?

If the online claim form provided perfectly adequate and compliant particulars but went on to say that detailed particulars were to follow, would the defendant still be entitled to refrain from filing a defence until after those detailed particulars had been served? There is a case for the claimant to be required to file the particulars as well as the certificate so as to reduce the risk of a default judgment being entered when the particulars have not, in fact, been served. As things presently stand, it is possible for the claimant to state on the claim form that the particulars will follow and then proceed to procure a default judgment purely on the strength of a false certificate.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll