header-logo header-logo

14 March 2014
Issue: 7598 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Judgment—Default judgment—Setting aside judgment

Samara v MBI & Partners UK Ltd and others [2014] EWHC 563 (QB), [2014] All ER (D) 48 (Mar)

Queen’s Bench Division, Silber J, 4 Mar 2014

The new regime that has implemented the Jackson proposals and altered the CPR applies to all the CPR, including applications to set aside default judgments under CPR Pt 13.

Sam Neaman (instructed by Ferguson Solicitors LLP) for the claimant. Derrick Dale QC and Rebecca Loveridge (instructed by Trowers & Hamlin LLP) for the first defendant. The second defendant did not appear and was not represented.

In March 2011, the claimant issued proceedings against the first defendant, claiming sums due to him under an employment contract. Neither an acknowledgement of service nor a defence was filed within the time limits prescribed by the CPR or at all. In September 2011, the master gave permission to enter judgment against the first defendant in default, which was entered in February 2012. The first defendant applied to set aside the default judgment under CPR 13.3. The application was rejected by the master, on grounds including

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll