header-logo header-logo

21 November 2022
Issue: 8004 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Pensions , Employment
printer mail-detail

Judges’ salary review delay

The five-year review of the judicial salary structure has been postponed, the Lord Chancellor Dominic Raab has confirmed.

Writing to Senior Salaries Review Body (SSRB) interim chair Pippa Lambert last week, Raab said: ‘We are due to have a major review of the judicial salary structure, which usually takes place every five years.

‘I understand your concerns about starting a major review before a new judicial lead and permanent chair of the SSRB are appointed and so have taken the decision not to commission such a review this year.’

He said recruitment has been ‘stronger’ since the last major review in 2018 due to a new judicial pension scheme, but acknowledged there are ‘shortfalls in the Circuit Bench and the District Bench, and the level of fee paid judges applying for salaried office continues to be an issue. These areas would be a likely focus of a future major review’.

However, Raab asked for recommendations on the 2023-24 annual pay award for judges to be submitted by May 2023. He said this should ‘take account of evidence which my department will provide, including on the affordability of any award as well as evidence on recruitment, retention and diversity of judges’.

In April 2022, the Judicial Pension Scheme, a defined benefit scheme, was introduced. This replaced a variety of schemes introduced in 2015 which many judges found to be less beneficial than their previous arrangements. In the 2018 major review, the SSRB highlighted recruitment and retention problems at all levels of the judiciary due to the 2015 pension reforms.

Judicial salaries currently range from £91,217 for judges at the social entitlement chamber (asylum support tribunal, criminal injuries compensation tribunal and social security and child support tribunal) to £267,509 for the Lord Chief Justice.

District judges, employment tribunal judges and First-tier Tribunal judges receive £114,793 per year, Senior masters and registrars earn £148,820, and High Court judges receive £192,679. 

Issue: 8004 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Pensions , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll