header-logo header-logo

25 June 2014
Issue: 7612 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Judges’ pay

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has issued an update on judges’ pensions following the case of O’Brien v MoJ [2013] UKSC 6, and Miller v MoJ at the employment tribunal in January.

It will implement a fee-paid Judicial Pension Scheme (JPS) for fee-paid service from 7 April 2000 to 31 March 2015 for eligible fee-paid judicial office holders, as described in the Miller judgment. The scheme will mirror the current Judicial Pensions & Retirement Act scheme. 

Fee-paid judicial office holders will qualify for the scheme from 7 April 2000, although that date is subject to appeal and may change.

The new JPS 2015, due to begin on 1 April 2015, will apply to fee-paid and salaried judicial office holders. A 12-week consultation on its regulations began on 17 June 2014 and ends on 8 September. The MoJ has urged all affected parties to view the consultation.

 

Issue: 7612 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll