header-logo header-logo

Judges face fashion make over

19 July 2007
Issue: 7282 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

News

Plans to reform judicial court working dress in England and Wales have been announced by the lord chief justice, Lord Phillips.
From 1 January 2008, wigs, wing collars and bands will become a thing of the past for judges sitting in open court in civil and family proceedings. Phillips has made it clear that he expects barristers to throw off such accoutrements too.

The Bar Council immediately launched a consultation among its members. Bar chairman, Geoffrey Vos QC, warns that court dress has always been a sensitive matter, upon which there are “widely divergent views”.
In the criminal courts, barristers and judges will be allowed to keep their trimmings, although High Court judges will be restricted to a single set of robes—those they currently wear in winter—for criminal proceedings throughout the year.

In civil and family proceedings, the circuit bench will continue to wear the same gown while all other judges will wear a new, simple, gown which is currently being designed.

Phillips says that, although the one-off cost of the new civil gown will be around £200,000, the move will save about £300,000 a year thereafter.

Issue: 7282 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll