header-logo header-logo

13 February 2015
Issue: 7641 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Judges' concern over increasingly difficult job

An in-depth survey of salaried judges has revealed widespread concern that the job is getting harder each year.

The Senior Salaries Review Body (SSRB), which recommends appropriate pay to the government for senior public service positions, suggested last year that a survey would help them prepare their 2015 report. All salaried judges in courts and non-devolved tribunals across the UK were invited to fill in a questionnaire in October 2014. 

The 2014 UK Judicial Attitude Survey, carried out by University College London (UCL), found that 86% of judges who have been in post for at least five years felt working conditions are worse now than they were five years ago. The courts judiciary in England and Wales reported a greater deterioration in working conditions than UK tribunal judges, and the view was held most strongly by judges in certain posts—94% of Circuit Judges; 91% of District Judges; and 85% of Justices of Appeal.

Nearly half—46%—of courts judiciary in England and Wales said their caseload over the last year was too high, compared with 27% of UK tribunal judges.

Half of the courts judiciary rated IT equipment in courts as “poor”. Almost two-thirds (65%) of judges report low morale among court staff, and more than three-quarters describe the amount of administrative support as “poor” or “inadequate”.

The majority of judges described as “poor” or “inadequate” career progression (63%), opportunities for sitting in other jurisdictions (62%) and flexible working (59%).

However, the vast majority of judges were clearly satisfied with the challenge of the job, variety of work, and quality of training.

Almost half of all District, Circuit and Employment Judges said they would consider pursuing additional income through out of court work if this option existed. However, Justices of Appeal (16%), Upper Tribunal judges (22%) and High Court judges (27%) were notably less keen.

In a joint statement, the Lord Chief Justice Lord Thomas and the Senior President of Tribunals Lord Justice Sullivan said: “The survey shows that many judges are feeling, in common with millions of other people, that their work has become harder year after year in many ways. Even though they know they are well paid compared to most people, they, like many others, have seen their pay drop in real terms.

“The survey also shows that judges do not carry out the work solely for the money. Their work is rewarding, but also demanding—confronting significant human suffering, loss and family breakdowns or untangling business transactions with livelihoods and businesses at stake. Judges are dedicated to their role, working harder and longer to keep standards high. Investment which has been promised to give judges modern IT will help.”

 

Issue: 7641 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll