header-logo header-logo

28 May 2014
Issue: 7608 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Judge treads carefully on Operation Cotton

Sir Brian Leveson “carefully avoided adding to an already bitter industrial dispute” between barristers and the Ministry of Justice when he ruled on R v Crawley (Operation Cotton), according to The Justice Gap editor and NLJ columnist, Jon Robins.

The Court of Appeal, led by Sir Brian, last week overturned Southwark Crown Court’s decision to halt the multi-million pound fraud trial due to legal aid cuts leaving the defence bereft of suitably-qualified barristers. A further eight Very High Cost Cases (VHCCs) due to take place in the coming months are likely to encounter similar problems.

Robins says: “Sir Brian warned the justice secretary and the Bar to overcome their ‘impasse’—his words.

“But how? The two sides are as firmly entrenched as they were before last week's ruling. The Bar is under huge pressure. The Ministry of Justice is apparently on a recruitment drive for the Public Defender Service in the event of future 'market failures'—just like the Army’s vintage Green Goddess fire engines in the firefighters' strike 10 years ago.

"It remains to be seen to what extent the Bar has the support of solicitors over VHCCs after the Criminal Bar Association decided to pursue its own 'separate peace' with government. More seriously, the Jeffrey review last month raised fundamental questions about the long-term 'viability' of the Bar model.”

 

Issue: 7608 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll