header-logo header-logo

17 February 2012 / Sarah Whitten
Issue: 7501 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

A job for life?

Sarah Whitten endorses government proposals to encourage parental involvement

More needs to be done to provide divorced parents with legal rights and the final report of the independent Family Justice Review, published last November, contained proposals designed to address this pressing issue. The government’s response, published last week, accepts the majority of the review’s recommendations in full. Indeed, the response goes further by recommending that the law should be changed to include a legislative statement of the importance of children having an ongoing relationship with both parents after family separation, where that is safe, and in the child’s best interest.

The government has established a working group of ministers to develop proposals for legislative change, which will be brought forward for consultation later this year. This needs to be at the top of the government’s agenda—it is the responsibility of both parents to raise their children and the right of every child to have a relationship with both their parents. The proposed changes to the law will help to give every child that chance.

Child’s rights paramount

The government’s response stresses

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll