header-logo header-logo

22 January 2010 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7401 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

The Jackson verdict

As I ripped into the report it soon became clear that the man had pulled it off.

I will never forget Thursday 14 January 2010. The day began with a “lock-in” at the Court of Appeal but no liquor in sight. At 0930 a herd of anoraks were allowed the privilege of being shut in a room to read the final conclusions of Sir Rupert Jackson, a year after he had taken on the impossible task of restructuring our costs regime, which was a ghastly mess. As I ripped into the report it soon became clear that the man had pulled it off.

It is an inevitability of my work that I regularly read reports and judgments. What Jackson LJ has produced is lucid, reasoned and stunning. I read the final report until my eyes ached. It is traditional for those who author reports to invite comment. The Jackson masterstroke was to get out on the road and canvass opinions from all who attended. Votes were taken.

Exact numbers were noted. Points made were recorded

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll