header-logo header-logo

28 October 2013 / Dominic Regan
Categories: Features , Costs , CPR , Jackson
printer mail-detail

Jackson: six months on

Dominic Regan serves up a survival guide

Obey!

Orders, rules and directions are to be strictly adhered to. Applications for relief from sanctions are governed by a revised CPR 3.9 which, says Jackson LJ, "is intended to be a stricter test limiting the cases in which it will be appropriate for the court to grant relief from sanctions”. Early decisions from the High Court bench demonstrate how robust the new approach is.

In judicial training this year the bench was encouraged to get tough on default. Edwards-Stuart J  on May 22 gave a judgment in Venulum Property Investments Ltd v Space Architecture Ltd and others [2013] EWHC 1242 (TCC). An application was made for permission to extend time for service of particulars of claim. Due to an innocent and unfortunate misunderstanding it was erroneously thought that one could serve particulars 14 days after the claim form. Not so. The long-stop deadline is four months after the issue of the claim form (see CPR 7.4 (2) and 7.5 (1)). The extension was refused.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll