header-logo header-logo

15 March 2017
Issue: 7738 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Jackson’s judicial review roadshow

Lord Justice Jackson’s latest fixed costs roadshow has provided further indications that he may row back from his initial support for fixed recoverable costs in all cases valued at up to £250,000.

Jackson LJ began his review into fixed costs in November, and is conducting a series of seminars to gather facts.

However, lawyers voiced their concerns about fixed costs in judicial review cases at Jackson LJ’s latest seminar, at the Law Society’s London headquarters this week.

City Law School’s Professor Dominic Regan, who advised Sir Rupert on his 2010 review of civil justice costs, and who attended the seminar, said: “It was obvious that there was no appetite for fixed costs in judicial review work.

“Again and again, random members of the audience spoke with one voice. The staggering breadth of judicial review work was not regarded as capable of capture by a rigid costs regime.

“However, much was said in praise of the Aarhus Convention model enshrined in CPR 45.41–44. This imposes a limit on the amount of adverse costs. [Jackson LJ] may not then be proposing as radical a fixed costs landscape as he initially envisaged in his January 2016 opening proposals.”

In a progress report on his review, released earlier this month, he restated his support for lower value cases but said he had “an open mind” about what types and level of cases should fall within such a regime. He is due to complete his review by 31 July 2017. 

Issue: 7738 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll