header-logo header-logo

14 May 2009
Issue: 7369 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Costs
printer mail-detail

Jackson report counts the cost

Access to justice and fairness core to ambitious review of civil litigation costs

Lord Justice Jackson launched his preliminary report into the cost of civil litigation at a press conference last Friday.

The 650-page report is the culmination of four months of research, and covers how civil litigation is—or could be funded—legal aid, before and after-the-event insurance, third party funding, conditional fee agreements, and contingency fees.

The report looks at the present regime of fixed costs, as well as ways to control the costs of litigation, such as case management, cost capping, and recoverability of success fees.

Peter Clough, head of disputes at Osborne Clark, says: “Lord Justice Jackson and his team have taken on a huge task in his root-and-branch review of civil litigation costs. It’s a very ambitious project on a complex set of issues. Although this preliminary report gives little away about his current thinking, it highlights the areas upon which he would like comments during the consultation.

“One area of concern expressed to him relates to the costs of exchanging documents about the disputes. If the final report suggests any radical changes, it will be interesting to see if there is sufficient political will to implement them in the current economic climate.”

Amanda Wadey, a solicitor at LexisPSL, commended the breadth of Jackson LJ’s remit and the amount he has already achieved in four months. “While he accepts that we are confined to some extent by our common law system it is clear that he is starting with a clean sheet,” she says. “His exploration of civil code jurisdictions shows that he does not consider himself confined by the current structure. It is evident that access to justice is at the core of this root and branch review and this has to be applauded.”

Jackson LJ is consulting on his report until the end of July and intends to publish his final report in December. The report is available at http://www.judiciary.gov. uk/about_judiciary/cost-review/ preliminary-report.htm (see this issue pp 683, 685 & 706).

Issue: 7369 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll