header-logo header-logo

13 September 2012
Issue: 7529 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Jackson jobs anxiety

ACL survey predicts redundancy wave across PI firms

The Jackson reforms are likely to trigger a wave of redundancies across “demoralised” personal injury firms when they come into force in April.

Some 62% of claimant personal injury firms say they expect to make staff redundant as a direct result of the reforms, according to a snapshot survey of 50 firms conducted by the Association of Costs Lawyers (ACL). Only one in 10 firms say for sure they will not.

Lord Justice Jackson’s reforms to civil litigation, which include abolishing recoverability of success fees in “no win, no fee” cases, will be introduced by Pt 2 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 and are due to begin next April.

The majority of claimant lawyers responding to the ACL survey say they expect to lose work and make less profit as a result of the reforms.

More than two-thirds of respondents think the reforms will make their firms less willing to take on riskier cases, while more than three-quarters predict they will have less work, and 84% believe they will make less profit.

Nine out of 10 lawyers say they expect competition to drive down success fees once they are no longer recoverable from the other side. The survey also revealed confusion over who would pay for after-the-event insurance—the client, the solicitor or a mixture of the two.

Iain Stark, chair of the ACL, says: “It is easy for the public and policymakers to be indifferent to the impact of the Jackson reforms on claimant lawyers, but the responses to our survey indicate a demoralised group of people who will not be able to hold open the door so that injured people can access justice.”

Issue: 7529 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll