header-logo header-logo

04 April 2019 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7835 / Categories: Opinion , Personal injury , Costs
printer mail-detail

Jackson & fixed costs: the final chapter revisited

Dominic Regan reports on the next steps for Sir Rupert Jackson’s fixed costs finale

At long last we have the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) consultation on fixed costs (‘Extending Fixed Recoverable Costs in Civil Cases: Implementing Sir Rupert Jackson’s proposals’, March 2019). It has taken the department longer to respond than it took Sir Rupert Jackson to investigate and write his comprehensive report. There are two elements of reform. The plan is to fix costs in every fast track claim worth up to £25,000. More radical is the extension of fixed costs to most current multi-track claims between £25,000 and £100,000. An enormous volume of work would be captured.

Various benefits are claimed for the changes. Litigants would have certainty as to their liability if they lose and their recovery if they win—the continuing great uncertainty as to proportionality since 2013 falls away. A formula to determine recoverable costs in fast track is to be found at pages 16 and 17 of the consultation, and for the higher value cases at pages 33 and 34. Grids set

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll