header-logo header-logo

28 February 2008 / Juliet Carp
Issue: 7310 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Profession , Employment
printer mail-detail

It's raining expats cases

Increasing mobility of employees is leading to more jurisdictional disputes, says Juliet Carp

Over the last few months English courts have been busy looking at when our laws apply to employees working abroad. In 2006 the House of Lords decided, in the joined cases of Lawson v Serco Ltd; Botham v Ministry of Defence; Crofts and others v Veta Ltd and others [2006] UKHL 3, [2006] All ER 823 that employees can only claim unfair dismissal in Britain if they are “employed in Great Britain”. Three exceptional situations were described where employees working overseas can make claims here. These are: peripatetic employees based in ; employees working in a British enclave abroad; and employees posted abroad for the purposes of a British business (the latter exception did not actually apply to any of the employees considered in Serco).

Serco was followed by Williams v University of Nottingham UKEAT/0124/07/RN, [2007] All ER (D) 304 (Jan) in which the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) applied the third exception to a lecturer working in . Williams

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll