header-logo header-logo

16 October 2015 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7672 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

In it together?

Alec Samuels examines the ins & outs of hot-tubbing

“Hot-tubbing” is the idiomatic or picturesque phrase for experts giving their evidence concurrently, ie both together in the witness box. The practice is still very uncommon in England, very rare in medical cases, but beginning to be used in engineering and construction disputes in arbitration and in the Technical and Construction Court, and even in the Family Court.

Procedure

There are so far no specific rules governing the procedure. Clearly the factual basis of the case needs to be set out first. Each side could call their principal lay witness, to be examined, cross-examined and re-examined. Or, more in accordance with modern practice, the written statements could be put in, so as in effect to set the scene. The respective experts would then be taken together.

The judge will question the experts, taking topic by topic, putting the same question to each expert in turn. At the end of the questioning on each topic the judge will invite the respective advocates to further question the experts, a sort of cross-examination or re-examination but more of a process

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll