header-logo header-logo

16 October 2015 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7672 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

In it together?

Alec Samuels examines the ins & outs of hot-tubbing

“Hot-tubbing” is the idiomatic or picturesque phrase for experts giving their evidence concurrently, ie both together in the witness box. The practice is still very uncommon in England, very rare in medical cases, but beginning to be used in engineering and construction disputes in arbitration and in the Technical and Construction Court, and even in the Family Court.

Procedure

There are so far no specific rules governing the procedure. Clearly the factual basis of the case needs to be set out first. Each side could call their principal lay witness, to be examined, cross-examined and re-examined. Or, more in accordance with modern practice, the written statements could be put in, so as in effect to set the scene. The respective experts would then be taken together.

The judge will question the experts, taking topic by topic, putting the same question to each expert in turn. At the end of the questioning on each topic the judge will invite the respective advocates to further question the experts, a sort of cross-examination or re-examination but more of a process

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll