header-logo header-logo

Is social media a defective product? Pt 1

216110
In the first part of a new series, Harry Lambert puts social media firms under the spotlight, asking: to what extent are they liable for harm?
  • Considers whether it is possible to sue social media companies, or whether they are protected by immunity—either contractual or statutory.
  • Examines in detail the law in relation to social media algorithms and asks if they are covered by the Electronic Commerce (EC Directive) Regulations 2002.

This series evaluates the potential liability of social media companies for the harms caused by their algorithms and platform design.

This part considers whether it is possible to sue social media companies at all, or whether they are protected by contractual or statutory immunity. In part two, on the assumption that such immunity can be circumnavigated, I will consider which causes of action provide the best vehicle for such claims, against the backdrop of the wider statutory framework governing social media contained in the new Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023). Part three we will delve deeper into the potential

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll