header-logo header-logo

02 September 2022
Issue: 7992 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Is Rwanda agreement lawful?

The UK–Rwanda partnership is not legally binding, has not been subject to scrutiny by Parliament, and fails to protect asylum-seekers’ rights, the Law Society has warned

Giving evidence to the House of Lords International Agreements Committee last week, the Law Society highlighted that the UK would be unable to protect an asylum seeker’s human rights. It warned people would be given insufficient notice or time to get legal advice about their removal―just 14 days, or seven days if in immigration detention.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said monitoring bodies referred to in the agreement have not been set up and there were few details. Moreover, Boyce said there was a risk individuals removed by the UK might face persecution in Rwanda or be returned to their country of origin, breaking the 1951 UN Convention on Refugees prohibition on ‘refoulement’.

The Committee, chaired by Baroness Hayter, is conducting an inquiry into the memorandum of understanding between the UK and Rwanda for an asylum partnership agreement.

Issue: 7992 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll