header-logo header-logo

07 January 2011
Issue: 7447 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Irish abortion laws contravene Art 8

Ireland must reconsider its laws and policies on abortion after a ruling by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR).

A, B and C v Ireland (App No 25579/05) concerned a woman who had suffered from a rare form of cancer that she feared would return as a result of her pregnancy and who was refused an abortion. She also feared there would be a risk to the foetus if she continued to term, and claimed she could not obtain clear advice.

The ECtHR held unanimously that there had been a breach of Art 8, right to private and family life. It found the Irish government had failed to properly implement its law that an abortion is lawful where the woman’s life is at risk.
The ECtHR held that “neither the medical consultation nor litigation options, relied on by the Irish government, constituted effective and accessible procedures which allowed the third applicant to establish her right to a lawful abortion in Ireland”. It noted that women and their doctors ran a risk of conviction and imprisonment if the doctor’s decision was later found to be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll