header-logo header-logo

13 March 2020
Categories: Legal News , Tax
printer mail-detail

IR35 attracts lawyers’ ire

Lawyers have slated the decision by the Chancellor to press ahead with IR35 implementation in April
Lawyers have slated the decision by the Chancellor to press ahead with IR35 implementation in April.

The Treasury confirmed in this week’s Budget that it will legislate to implement the changes to the off-payroll working rules (IR35) from 6 April 2020. The rule change aims to catch out contractors who set up limited companies to minimise tax exposure while working in similar conditions to that of an employee.

DWF corporate tax partner Caroline Colliston said the implementation would ‘occur against a backdrop of concerns… about the impact on business, the labour supply chain and the confusion and lack of clarity around the terms and operation of the legislation’.

She suggested employers ‘take quick action’ to ensure compliance, including ‘identifying their contingent workforce, ensuring the burden of operating PAYE is shifted down their contractual labour supply chain, reviewing the terms of contracts in their labour supply chain, adopting robust internal procedures and audits to ensure status determination statements are provided and liability is limited as well as considering establishing an employment status disagreement process’.

Seb Maley, CEO of IR35 compliance specialist Qdos, called the move to continue with the 6 April start date for IR35 a ‘needless, short-sighted tax grab’.

Miles Dean, head of international tax at Andersen Tax UK, said: ‘Contractors are an easy target. The sector has been rife with tax avoidance for many years and this, unfortunately, is the result. Are large corporates, who may have well over 1000 contractors at a time, really supposed to undertake an individual review of each one's affairs and then certify whether or not they’re employees or consultants?

‘Putting the burden of determining status on the third party company is onerous, impractical and unfair to say the least, irrespective of the current coronavirus outbreak. The fact that businesses are at risk from both HMRC and the contractor if it wrongly determines the status of an individual is a very unfortunate feature of the legislation.

‘A form of self-certification from the contractor would be much more equitable, particularly in circumstances where the determination between employee and self-employed is borderline. Which it very often is.’

Categories: Legal News , Tax
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll