header-logo header-logo

31 July 2013
Issue: 7571 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Intolerant times?

Concern about creation of tort of intolerance

Are we seeing the emergence of a “tort of intolerance”? It is characterised by civil claims resulting in severe consequences such as loss of livelihood for individuals who express non-conformist beliefs, says barrister Jon Holbrook in this week’s NLJ. He cites the examples of Dr Hans-Christian Raabe who was sacked from a government drugs advisor post for previously expressing anti-gay views that had little to do with his post. Should the state back such severe sanctions for expressing what it considers to be unacceptable views? Holbrook argues that John Stuart Mill would be “turning in his grave at the intolerant attitudes fostered by the coercive power of today’s civil courts directed at thinkers, registrars, counsellors and bus drivers”.

Issue: 7571 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll