header-logo header-logo

13 October 2020
Issue: 7906 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Intimidation can be ‘part of everyday life’ at Bar

Bullying, discrimination and harassment at the Bar are widespread, a study commissioned by the Bar Standards Board (BSB) has found

Experiences varied between sexual harassment, unfair treatment on the basis of protected characteristics, long-term bullying, unreasonable work demands, belittling comments and unfair work allocation. Low to medium-level incidents were the most common, particularly for people from underrepresented groups. The study uncovered a ‘shared sense’ that a barrister who wasn’t white, male and from a ‘high social grade’ was less likely to be recommended by clerks, given work by senior barristers or employed by solicitors.

In the report, 'Bullying, Discrimination and Harassment at the Bar', published this week barristers pointed out that the Bar is ‘an environment in which power is key, and the ability to dominate over other people in order to win an argument is crucial.

‘In this environment, bullying and intimidation are rife, and often seem like part of everyday life at the Bar.’ Participants said ‘this culture of bullying and aggression is often a learned behaviour pattern―many were bullied or victimised themselves as young barristers, and therefore can feel it is the norm to act this way’.

Such behaviour can have long-term consequences, such as diminished self-esteem, anxiety, health complications, lowered earning capacity and disruption of professional relationships.

Pupil barristers were the most vulnerable, participants said. Even the architecture of the Bar, with ‘warrens of small rooms and poorly lit courtyards’ producing a ‘conspiratorial’ atmosphere made it easier for bullying to happen.

The study, by YouGov, involved telephone interviews with 30 barristers and five non-barristers who had directly experienced or observed bullying, discrimination and harassment at the Bar.

However, most barristers interviewed had not formally reported their experiences, mainly due to fears for their reputation at work and future career.

The study called for a shift in culture at the Bar to encourage openness and discourage inappropriate behaviour, with a role for the BSB, Bar Council and professional networks in driving change.

BSB head of equality and access to justice, Amit Popat, said: ‘It is plain from the study that there are significant cultural factors, including power imbalances, which inhibit the reporting of bullying and harassment.’

 

 

Issue: 7906 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll