header-logo header-logo

05 May 2011 / Michael Tringham
Issue: 7464 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Intestacy turns to trust

Michael Tringham reviews some recent court decisions at home & abroad

The relationship of cohabitants Tina Cattle and Paul John Evans ended on 23 March 1990, when 59-year-old Mr Evans died—intestate. Subsequently Ms Cattle claimed “reasonable provision” from the deceased’s £220,000 estate, referring to a will drafted three days before his death but never executed. Mr Evans’s sons Paul and Gareth, beneficiaries on the intestacy, disputed her claim.

The couple lived together in England, Spain and latterly Wales between 1990 and 2009—albeit with a two-year hiatus after 1997. The trial transcript (Cattle v Evans [2011] EWHC 945 (Ch)) refers to a marriage proposal that was never formalised—and the planned purchase of a home in Wales with money from the sale of a jointly owned Spanish property.  But that plan was overtaken by the deceased’s being diagnosed with terminal cancer eight months before his death. Instead he bought the house almost entirely with his own money and the property was conveyed into his sole name, apparently for tax reasons.

While solicitors’ attendance notes record that under the proposed will the Welsh property was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll