header-logo header-logo

15 April 2010 / Michael Tringham
Issue: 7413 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Intestacy the NSW way

Michael Tringham examines legal changes down under

With the Law Commission’s current consultation on “Intestacy and Family Provision Claims on Death” in mind, attention is drawn to New South Wales’ new intestacy laws. Part of the overall push for the harmonisation of succession laws throughout Australia, they change how an estate is to be distributed when a person dies without a will. I am indebted to Sandra Rocha of Sydney law firm SWAAB for her succinct analysis of the Succession Act 2006 as amended.

As of 1 March 2010 “spouse” includes a married, or a domestic partner who may be of the same or opposite sex. If an intestate had multiple spouses—that is, a relationship with their married partner and one or more domestic partners all at the same time—they will all share the estate, either by written agreement or court order. A “domestic partner” is one who had been continuously for at least two years in what used to be called a de facto relationship or that had resulted in the birth of a child.

If the intestate leaves one or more

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll