header-logo header-logo

15 July 2010 / Michael Tringham
Issue: 7426 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Intestacies averted

Family troubles continue to keep probate in the headlines. Michael Tringham provides an update

Victor Reeve bequeathed most of his estate to his nieces, with whom he had a “close and affectionate” relationship—and excluding his adopted children, with whom he was said to be on poor terms. But shortly before his death from cancer he revoked his Will, stating that he wanted the money to devolve to the adoptees under intestacy laws. Letters showed that, like many seriously ill people, he was in a confused state, “remembering” attacks that never happened. The High Court (Hinton & Hayes v Leigh & Reeve [2009] EWCH 2658 Ch) found the testator’s change of mind was based on delusions caused by a mental disease “poisoning his affections”, and confirmed that as the same testamentary capacity is required to revoke as to make a Will, the revocation was invalid.

Unsisterly allegation

The High Court rejected Angela Salmon’s claim that her sister Jacqueline forged their late mother’s Will. Ethel Lucille Hayles left most of her £300,000 estate to Jacqueline, explicitly disinheriting the younger sister in these words: “To my young daughter

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll