header-logo header-logo

19 February 2009 / Khawar Qureshi KC
Issue: 7357 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

International Rescue

Part two: Khawar Qureshi QC reflects on the growth of public international law in the English courts

In the first part of this series I covered the “sanctions cases” where public international law (PIL) was engaged (see NLJ, 13 February 2009, p 223). In this part, the key cases during 2008 relating to Iraq/Afghanistan, and cases concerning civil sovereign immunity are considered.

 

/ cases

 

Gentle

In R (on the application of Gentle and another) v The Prime Minister and others [2008] UKHL 20 the House of Lords (constituted by nine law lords) was asked by the mothers of two soldiers who died in Iraq (in March 2003 and June 2004 respectively—the latter after the United Nations Security Council had passed a resolution providing legal cover for the coalition forces in Iraq), to determine whether ss 1 and 2 of the Human Rights Act 1998 read together with Art 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) required the UK authorities to establish an independent public inquiry into circumstances

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll