header-logo header-logo

19 June 2008
Issue: 7326 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Insurance / reinsurance , Employment
printer mail-detail

Insurance costs

In brief

Employers who fail to provide health insurance for workers over 65 because of high expense could be liable for age discrimination claims. Geraldine Elliot, head of employment at Reynolds Porter Chamberlain, says: “Although treating staff differently on the basis of their age can be justified under age discrimination legislation, employers can only do so to pursue a legitimate aim and if the means it is using are proportionate.” Although firms may be able to justify not providing health cover due to expense, they should be aware of age discrimination liabilities. Elliot suggests companies invest in self-funding treatment or selfinsuring PHI cover for workers to protect themselves from discrimination claims.
 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll