header-logo header-logo

24 May 2007
Issue: 7274 / Categories: Features , Local government , Property
printer mail-detail

Information meltdown

HIPs will be hindered by the failure to reform the local authority search market, says Mark Riddick

Local government holds the information required by conveyancers to undertake their due diligence requirements on the purchase of a property by their clients. It competes with private companies in the compilation of searches for conveyancers from that information. It is claimed that certain local authorities compete unfairly by restricting the private search companies’ access to the information.

LOCAL AUTHORITY SEARCH FEES

Local authorities can justifiably claim that they do not have the resources (funding or personnel) to cope with providing the necessary facilities to private search companies. This is because central government has set a fee for access to this information at a level that is not currently calculated to recover all of the cost of maintaining and providing the information.
The fact that the fee charged to private search companies for access is £11, and the cost of a search compiled by a local authority (the so-called “official search”) can be as much as £300, suggests that either the local authority compilation is inefficient, private search companies are being

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll