header-logo header-logo

Inflated fees

17 April 2014
Issue: 7603 / Categories: Legal News , Fees , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Personal injury firms are “courting disaster” by routinely inflating success fees, a leading PI author has warned.

Writing in NLJ this week Jeff Zindani says he is upbeat about personal injury work for claimant lawyers, but is concerned about the way clients are charged.

“Before 1 April 2013, most practitioners were telling me that they would not charge clients. However, as many firms realised that others were charging, they started following suit.

"The position now is that the only people not charging anything extra are members of the Bar...We know that under the new rules there is a cap on charging over 25% of a client’s damages, but the rules say nothing about the level of success fee,” he adds.

Read Jeff's article in full 

Issue: 7603 / Categories: Legal News , Fees , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll