header-logo header-logo

17 April 2014
Issue: 7603 / Categories: Legal News , Fees , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Inflated fees

Personal injury firms are “courting disaster” by routinely inflating success fees, a leading PI author has warned.

Writing in NLJ this week Jeff Zindani says he is upbeat about personal injury work for claimant lawyers, but is concerned about the way clients are charged.

“Before 1 April 2013, most practitioners were telling me that they would not charge clients. However, as many firms realised that others were charging, they started following suit.

"The position now is that the only people not charging anything extra are members of the Bar...We know that under the new rules there is a cap on charging over 25% of a client’s damages, but the rules say nothing about the level of success fee,” he adds.

Read Jeff's article in full 

Issue: 7603 / Categories: Legal News , Fees , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll