header-logo header-logo

12 January 2012
Issue: 7496 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Industrial relations

London Underground Ltd v Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen [2011] EWHC 3506 (QB), [2011] All ER (D) 200 (Dec)

As a general notion a strike should have a democratic mandate, however, that begged the question as to what was the relevant ballot constituency. It did not necessarily follow that the persons who should be balloted had to be limited to those who would be on strike, that is, actually withdrawing their labour in breach of contract on a particular day.

It was important that the relevant wording in s 227 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 referred to persons whom a trade union believed would be induced “to take part…in the industrial action in question”. The statutory wording could have said, but did not say, “take…the industrial action in question”. The insertion of the words “take part…in” was a very strong indication that the ballot was not to be restricted to those who would actually take the industrial action
in question, namely withdraw their labour in breach of contract, but extended to those who would take part in such action.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll