header-logo header-logo

26 July 2023
Issue: 8035 / Categories: Legal News , Insurance / reinsurance , Cyber , Technology
printer mail-detail

Indemnity insurers in low-risk mindset but firms taking a chance on cyber attacks

Seven in ten (72%) firms have not purchased cyber insurance amid a hardening professional indemnity cover market overall, research has shown.

While 28% of firms bought cybercrime cover—an increase on the 21% who made the purchase in 2018—a further 33% of firms thought about it but didn’t go ahead, and 39% didn’t even consider it, according to the Law Society report, 'Latest trends in professional indemnity insurance for law firms', published last week.

Law Society president Lubna Shuja described the low take-up as ‘concerning’, given how more work is being conducted online post-pandemic.

Solicitors Regulation Authority minimum terms and conditions for professional indemnity insurance explicitly exclude from cover first-party losses from cyber attacks or other problems related to information technology. The Law Society has produced guidance on purchasing cyber insurance, available here.

A government report published in April, 'Cyber security breaches survey 2023', showed one in ten businesses had fallen victim to cybercrime in the previous 12 months. Larger businesses experienced higher risk—the strike rate was one quarter of medium-sized businesses, and nearly two-fifths of large businesses.

The professional indemnity insurance market for solicitors has hardened since 2018, when the Law Society last carried out a survey, with 56% (compared to 76% in 2018) reporting it was easy to purchase insurance.

Shuja said: ‘We advise firms to start budgeting for increased premiums and perhaps consider premium financing as a way to spread costs through the year.

‘We also recommend firms start the renewal process early; around three months before your renewal date. That means that if you are one of the more than 40% of firms who still have the old common renewal date of 1 October, you should have contacted your broker already to start exploring the right cover for your firm.’

She said some firms could face much higher premiums, particularly where they had high staff turnover, large numbers of fee earners or carried out high amounts of conveyancing work. New firms and firms switching insurers have faced difficulties with some underwriters imposing minimum prices for premiums, she said. However, for firms working in low-risk areas, the premium increase was likely to be in the low single figures.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll