header-logo header-logo

05 October 2012 / Patrick Allen
Issue: 7532 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Technology
printer mail-detail

An increasing chasm

Patrick Allen calls for urgent investment in information technology for the civil courts’ system

The IT revolution has changed the face of legal practice over the last 30 years. We acquired our first PCs and Macs in the early 1980s. We threw away our memory typewriters and golf ball printers. Later came the Internet, e-mails, BlackBerries, iPhones, the iPad, voice recognition and the Cloud. Communications between clients, solicitors, counsel and experts have been transformed by e-mail and scanning.

The revolution stops, however, when we arrive at the court system which is largely an IT-free zone for litigants and their lawyers.

Lord Woolf in his 1996 report on the Reform of Civil Justice suggested that the proper use of IT was one of the cornerstones for the reform success. However, there was no appetite for investment by the government and there is no doubt that the government’s failure to invest in IT for the courts held back the true potential of his reforms.

Hopes dashed

There have been occasional rays of hope that things would change. In 2007 I was a member

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll