header-logo header-logo

05 October 2012 / Patrick Allen
Issue: 7532 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Technology
printer mail-detail

An increasing chasm

Patrick Allen calls for urgent investment in information technology for the civil courts’ system

The IT revolution has changed the face of legal practice over the last 30 years. We acquired our first PCs and Macs in the early 1980s. We threw away our memory typewriters and golf ball printers. Later came the Internet, e-mails, BlackBerries, iPhones, the iPad, voice recognition and the Cloud. Communications between clients, solicitors, counsel and experts have been transformed by e-mail and scanning.

The revolution stops, however, when we arrive at the court system which is largely an IT-free zone for litigants and their lawyers.

Lord Woolf in his 1996 report on the Reform of Civil Justice suggested that the proper use of IT was one of the cornerstones for the reform success. However, there was no appetite for investment by the government and there is no doubt that the government’s failure to invest in IT for the courts held back the true potential of his reforms.

Hopes dashed

There have been occasional rays of hope that things would change. In 2007 I was a member

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll