header-logo header-logo

22 February 2013
Issue: 7549 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Income tax

Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Anson [2013] EWCA Civ 63, [2013] All ER (D) 123 (Feb)

The relevant test for determining whether a person was taxed on the same profits or income in both jurisdictions was whether the source of the profits or income in each jurisdiction was the same. Where the taxpayer became entitled to the profits of an entity because of some contractual arrangement to which he was a party, he had to show that the contract was actually the source of the profit, rather than a mechanism to secure a right to a profit derived from another source. That would in general mean that he had to show a proprietary right to the profits.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Jack Kelly

Gateley Legal—Jack Kelly

Gateley Legal expands Midlands residential development team

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn adds employee benefits and executive compensation practice in London with partner Richard Surtees

Laytons ETL—Alec Cameron

Laytons ETL—Alec Cameron

Laytons ETL appoints new partner and head of intellectual property disputes

NEWS
A series of recent decisions has clarified important principles across property law, from perpetuities to lease renewals and public rights over land
A series of recent decisions has clarified important principles across property law, from perpetuities to lease renewals and public rights over land
Employers cannot rely on wellbeing services alone to defend workplace stress claims after a High Court decision awarding almost £1m to an overworked employee
Andy Burnham's brand of 'Manchesterism' could offer fresh thinking on legal aid and access to justice if it reaches Westminster, according to Roger Smith, NLJ columnist and former director of JUSTICE
The constitutional fallout from a change of prime minister, rather than the politics, is under scrutiny as questions arise over the limits of executive authority in a leadership transition
back-to-top-scroll