header-logo header-logo

Income Tax

23 February 2012
Issue: 7502 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Revenue & Customs Commissioners v Cotter [2012] EWCA Civ 81, [2012] All ER (D) 83 (Feb)

If the Revenue decided to challenge matters contained in the return in response to the boxes provided, it had to use either the s 9A procedure or seek to make a correction to the return under s 9ZB of the Taxes Management Act 1970, if applicable. That was so even if, under the relevant statutory provisions governing loss relief claims, that claim could not be the subject of relief against liability to tax for the year to which the return related. In that case, it was up to the Revenue, if it wished to achieve the contrary result, to make sure that the form of return did not permit such a claim to be made. Section 9A(4) of the Act made it clear that the Revenue’s inquiry might extend to “anything contained in the return, or required to be contained in the return”.

The material words were “contained in”. Those words could not mean “required to be contained in” because that would make the alternative words redundant, contrary to well-established canons of construction. To

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll