header-logo header-logo

06 October 2017
Issue: 7764 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Income tax

Vowles v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2017] UKFTT 704 (TC), [2017] All ER (D) 117 (Sep)

The taxpayer, who alleged that she had been in an abusive relationship and had only accepted an appointment as the director of a company because her partner had been disqualified as a director, was not liable to pay tax on dividends paid by the company because, on the facts, the dividends had not been paid to her, but to her partner, who had controlled the company. Further, because, whilst in law, she had been the shareholder of the company, she had held her share on behalf of her partner, who, in equity, had been the person entitled to receive the dividends. So held the First-tier Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) (the FTT) in allowing the taxpayer’s appeal in part. Further, and among other things, the FTT, in applying the Taxes Management Act 1970 s 50(6)(a), discharged certain amendments to the taxpayer’s tax returns, which had been made by the Revenue and Customs Commissioners.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll