header-logo header-logo

Income tax

06 October 2017
Issue: 7764 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Vowles v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2017] UKFTT 704 (TC), [2017] All ER (D) 117 (Sep)

The taxpayer, who alleged that she had been in an abusive relationship and had only accepted an appointment as the director of a company because her partner had been disqualified as a director, was not liable to pay tax on dividends paid by the company because, on the facts, the dividends had not been paid to her, but to her partner, who had controlled the company. Further, because, whilst in law, she had been the shareholder of the company, she had held her share on behalf of her partner, who, in equity, had been the person entitled to receive the dividends. So held the First-tier Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) (the FTT) in allowing the taxpayer’s appeal in part. Further, and among other things, the FTT, in applying the Taxes Management Act 1970 s 50(6)(a), discharged certain amendments to the taxpayer’s tax returns, which had been made by the Revenue and Customs Commissioners.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll