header-logo header-logo

08 December 2011
Issue: 7493 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Income tax

Revenue and Customs Commissioners v PA Holdings Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1414, [2011] All ER (D) 237 (Nov)

The correct approach to determine whether the income receipts of an employee were emoluments or profits from employment was to consider all the facts relevant to the receipt of the income. That required the court not to be restricted to the legal form of the source of the payment but to focus on the character of the receipt in the hands of the recipient. Section 20(2) of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 had no application unless “a distribution chargeable under Sch F” was identified. It had no application to a payment chargeable under Sch E. Section 20(2) resolved the conflict where income from one and the same source, shares or certain securities, was charged under different Schedules.

That section provided that they had to be taxed under Sch F. It was not concerned to charge income under Sch F when the source of the income was charged under the different and mutually exclusive Sch E. A factual conclusion that income fell within Sch E precluded any finding

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll