header-logo header-logo

Income tax

08 December 2011
Issue: 7493 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Revenue and Customs Commissioners v PA Holdings Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1414, [2011] All ER (D) 237 (Nov)

The correct approach to determine whether the income receipts of an employee were emoluments or profits from employment was to consider all the facts relevant to the receipt of the income. That required the court not to be restricted to the legal form of the source of the payment but to focus on the character of the receipt in the hands of the recipient. Section 20(2) of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 had no application unless “a distribution chargeable under Sch F” was identified. It had no application to a payment chargeable under Sch E. Section 20(2) resolved the conflict where income from one and the same source, shares or certain securities, was charged under different Schedules.

That section provided that they had to be taxed under Sch F. It was not concerned to charge income under Sch F when the source of the income was charged under the different and mutually exclusive Sch E. A factual conclusion that income fell within Sch E precluded any finding

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll