header-logo header-logo

14 March 2013
Issue: 7552 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Incentives to settle

New costs rules to come into force next month

Rules encouraging parties to settle early, or risk paying out more if they lose, are due to come into force next month as part of the Jackson roll-out.

The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) allows for an additional amount to be paid to a claimant by a defendant in cases where the defendant has refused the claimant’s offer to settle and the court has given judgment for the claimant which is at least as advantageous to the claimant as the claimant’s offer. Bringing this new regime into practice, The Offers to Settle in Civil Proceedings Order 2013 sets out the percentage of damages which a defendant may be ordered to pay out on top. In offers up to £500,000 this will be 10% of the amount of damages awarded; above £500,000 and up to £1m, it will be 10% of the first £500,000 and 5% of the damages awarded above £500,000; while, for amounts above £1m, the figures are 7.5% of the first £1m and 0.001% of the damages awarded above that figure.

Janna Purdie, of LexisPSL Dispute Resolution, said apparent discrepancies between the 2013 Order and Pt 36, CPR could be explained. “Pt 36 provides for 10% of the first £500,000 and 5% above, up to £1m, namely a composite rate of 7.5% for awards of £1m. The 0.001% required by the 2013 Order arose from a requirement to set a prescribed percentage in s 55(3) of LASPO. Following concern that a percentage of 0% or nil per cent would not comply with this requirement, 0.001% was set so that effectively no additional amount will be paid over £1m. The CPR Committee considered that, as, in practice, no percentage will apply to figures over £1m, it need not be addressed in Pt 36.”
 

Issue: 7552 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll