header-logo header-logo

01 March 2024 / Kate McMahon
Issue: 8061 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Fraud
printer mail-detail

In defence of private prosecutions

161595
The Post Office treated the wronged postmasters inexcusably. But let’s not throw the baby out with the bathwater, argues Kate McMahon

It would be a tragic irony if, in response to the inexcusable failures of the government-owned Post Office, a legal remedy available to those wronged were to be revoked. Indeed, such an act would require lawyers and the public to put unrestrained faith in the exact same government that has failed to adequately supervise its own Post Office.

The inertia and partiality to be guarded against has been long recognised by our courts and the importance of the remedy of private prosecutions always enforced. In Gouriet v Union of Post Office Workers [1978] AC 435, [1977] 3 All ER 70, Lord Wilberforce said: ‘The individual… who wishes to see the law enforced has a remedy of his own: he can bring a private prosecution. This historical right, which goes right back to the earliest days of our legal system… remains a valuable constitutional safeguard against inertia or partiality on the part of authority.’

It is precisely that partiality or worse

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll